Restaurant delivery giant Deliveroo said legal workers rights challenges „could affect our ability to keep working in certain regions, including the UK”. He admitted that his business model is based on employing drivers as „self-employed people” in the US Investment prospectusthat the terms of the A £ 8.8 billion valuation to be listed on the London Stock Exchange.

Regarding the existing legal challenges related to labor rights in Italy, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands, the company said:

If government agencies in other jurisdictions made similar industry-wide changes to the gig economy and / or the status of food delivery workers without differentiating between operating models, it could have a material impact on our business.

Deliveroo continues, “If we had to make changes to the basis on which we engage drivers in a number of our markets or in our key markets, it could affect our ability to continue operating in those markets or require material changes to our model . „This is an admission for investors that the shares they are buying could be jeopardized by Deliveroo’s having to provide employment protection to its drivers.

One of its key markets is the UK, where the Supreme Court recently ruled that the ride-sharing company Uber must classify its drivers as workers who pay a minimum wage, a minimum pension and a minimum vacation. That ruling won’t change food delivery immediately – even Uber, which also operates Uber Eats, says it has no ramifications for its food delivery arm – but it has re-drawn attention to the means by which Deliveroo is used and How To Achieve Such Stratospheric Assessments: Lowering Labor Costs By Eliminating Minimum Wages, Pensions, and Vacation Allowances From Their Balance Sheet.

Deliveroo has included this information in its prospectus because it is an investment risk financially: if it starts making less money, those who invest in it will also make less or even lose money. One The UK fund Aviva turned the script upside down and said that there is indeed a lack of workers’ rights is the investment riskin a naked clarification of the mechanisms at the heart of the £ 8.8 billion valuation. Investment forecasters said last week that the Uber ruling „dampened” sentiment over Deliveroo’s initial public offering (IPO), calling it an „existential threat to Deliveroo”.

But the company has fought them before. A parliamentary investigation by MP Frank Field, who represented Labor at the time, found that his business model „is only offered these imposed self-employment opportunities to an unknown number of workers, although they require stable work at least for the level of the National Living Wage” in 2018. That followed the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB), which Deliveroo defeated because of the drivers’ self-employment status, but the The High Court upheld Deliveroo’s classification of drivers and the resulting lack of collective bargaining rights (union formation) during the year. Deliveroo has long claimed that its drivers are looking for the flexibility it can offer, even when that flexibility actually leads to one playful relationship between driver and company.

The economics of grocery delivery is such that these ps have to exploit someone to be viable – be it the worker or the restaurant. Deliveroo made its first win that year for unprecedented demand related to the Covid-19 pandemic, but its Valuations like Uber’s and many other gig economy giants are tied to growth over profitabilityalthough investors are starting to put pressure on this model. This explains why a company that has still reported an underlying loss of £ 224million in its most lucrative year to date can offer £ 8.8bn worth of value while its drivers cannot guarantee theirs a minimum wage upon signing up Bicycles and ferry food around the Cital.